What's in our future fisheries?

boater wrote:thats true, i`m to the point now of just saying fuk it

I think that's the natural thought progression, once you realize how fubar we are. So many obstacles, each one a mammoth undertaking. We're one user group, and we can't even agree between habitat or harvest reform. We know they're both critical in need, and dependent on the other, nope. We still have a major division, to the point we will sabotage one another's efforts.


Given the amount of disfunction, greed and money involved, we'll never even come close. It starts at the top, and nobody at the top is going to risk their livelihood. Why should they? We're so stupid we'd fall for every soundbyte projected on us. Too many stupid fukers, no way.



wow, spellcheck even corrects cuss words. who knew....

i`m just going to sit back and laugh at some of the posts on the boards, my favorite is guys complaining how silver fishing slows down on the columbia after the gillnets and they say "join the cca", they dont realize that the cca is pushing for a more selective method to catch more of the same fish that we fish for, if they think its slow after the gillnets just wait until they perfect a more selective method, it will be beyond slow, it wont even be worth going.

What if we're able to segregate not only hatchery and wild fish, but also commercial/tribal/and public fishing? Your whole anti-selective argument goes down the crapper. The entire argument is based on an assumption that commercial fisheries will choke off all other fisheries.


Booooooooo!

Ah, the "what if" tactic for rebuttal of a valid stance. Well played Sally, well played...

Hairlipangler wrote:

Your whole anti-selective argument goes down the crapper.

hairlip i`m not totally anti selective just in places it wont work

Go milk your chickens elkrump.


besides, it's better than suggesting fisheries and scenarios that don't even exist...... :11:





***edit*** ...actually it is suggesting fisheries and scenarios that don't even exist, but it's still better. :11:

Geez... now a neener, neener go milk a chicken? You are definitely off your game.